NOTE: FNH is on hiatus for a few months and will feature reposts and limited new material.

General: Food Network »

FNH Review: Private Chefs Of Beverly Hills Might Be The “Worst” Show On “Television”
Posted on April 11th 2010 by Jillian Madison

…and for the record, I used those stupid “quotations” in the “title” in honor of all the “chefs” who kept “flashing air quotes” on the “show.”

privatechefs410-1

I wanted to like Private Chefs of Beverly Hills. Really. I did. It combines two of my favorite guilty pleasures: reality television and food. But after the first 4 minutes of the show, I found myself wanting to blow up my tv and turn into an anorexic. Sadly, it was just that bad.

Private Chefs follows the totally fake culinary misadventures of a team of actors caterers as they deal with their quirky, demanding Beverly Hills clients. The premise: pretty rich people call Big City Chefs to cater an event, and then pretty chefs show up and cook food that the pretty rich people complain about. Fun for all!

On the premiere episode, the chefs had to cater three ridiculous events for three annoying clients. Brooke Peterson and Stuart O’Keeffe catered a Botox party, Sasha Perl-Raver and Brian Hill did a glamping (glamorous camping) event, and Manouschka Guerrier and Jesse Brune catered a meet and greet for pampered dogs and their owners. And of course, each team had an obnoxious, demanding client to deal with. Because, you know, everyone is Beverly Hills is a prick. (Sorry, Jim Walsh. That unfortunately means you, too.)

If you found yourself wondering why some of the events came off as scripted or fake, IT’S BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY WERE. Eric Greenspan, one of the clients during the camping segment, got a soliciting email from a Food Network producer, asking him if he wanted to join other executives for a catered camping trip. It was not a group of friends out enjoying nature as the show suggested. And remember the campfire that Sasha and Brian cooked on? Turns out, Eric started it.

And that was just the tip of the iceberg of the show’s manufactured drama. Each story line literally came off as stupider, more fake, and more uninteresting than the last. Even worse, it’s like you could almost see the producers sitting around a round table, brainstorming ideas on how to make the chefs struggle.

BROOKE & PATRICK’S CONTRIVED STORY LINE
Brooke & Patrick catered a Botox party for a bunch of women obsessed with plastic surgery. The client didn’t like their trio of soup appetizers, which left them scrambling at the last minute to come up with another dish. And even craaaaazier, the client asked the chefs to give each dish a stupid spa name, like “whispering wave tuna bites.” AND, just when you thought they had already squeezed every last bit of manufactured drama out of the segment, the client told Brooke she could “use a little Botox” on her forehead.

privatechefs410-2
For the record, Brooke, we think your forehead looks just fine.

JESSE & MANOUSCHKA’S CONTRIVED STORY LINE
Jesse & Manouschka cooked for a bunch of pampered dogs and their owners. To kick things off, Jesse wanted to let us all know how WILD AND CRAZY he is, so he (gasp!) took a nibble of a dog treat! Shock and awe, people. Shock and awe!

The menu had already been finalized, but in the 11th hour, wouldn’t you know it? The wacko client told them they’d have to make individualized dishes catered to each guest’s specific needs, complete with a bunch of ingredients they didn’t have! Oh, the drama!

The “only funny line of the night” award went to Manouschka, who said, “I’m not Burger King. They can’t have it their way.” Coincidentally, she also gets the award for the “most difficult to spell name.”

Of course, in the end, just like an episode of The Brady Bunch, the two improvised their way through it all and the event was a success. And Jesse didn’t die from eating the dog treat, which I guess is a good thing.

BRIAN AND SASHA’S CONTRIVED STORY LINE
Brian and Sasha catered the aforementioned glamorous camping (a.k.a. “GLAMPING”) event for a bunch of rich white guys who may – or may not – have Ina Garten on their speed dial. Just like in that difficult episode of Top Chef last season, they had to cook over a camp fire.  And just like in Top Chef, they couldn’t get the fire lit let alone control the temperature once it got going.

privatechefs410-4

But wait! There’s more! They also had to deal with a hovering chef who wanted to micromanage their every move! Three cheers for an original plot twist! (sarcasm alert)

Yes, the clients were all incredibly demanding, but the private chefs were nice to them and at the end of the day, ultimately gave them all what they wanted. They then proceeded to talk shit about them behind their backs in their one-on-one interviews with the cameras. Now that’s good business! The bad news is, if any of the clients were actually real, they might not ever use Big City Chefs again. The good news is, I think about 25 people watched this show, so the damage might not be too bad.

Are these “private chefs” even chefs? Or are they just actors with a tiny bit of cooking experience? Jesse Brune was on the Bravo show Work Out and supposedly just graduated from culinary school in ’06. Manouschka Guerrier has no real culinary training, but has been appearing in bit roles since 1998. Brooke has been doing cheap cooking segments for various internet outlets, but lost any credibility she might have had when she admitted her biggest culinary influences were Rachael Ray and Sandra Lee. Brian got eliminated from Top Chef Season 1 in the 3rd week, and now operates a food truck. And Sasha? Her claim to fame seems to be that she once baked cupcakes for Lindsay Lohan’s birthday, and some guy once referred to her as a fat Angelina Jolie. Really?

All I can say is this: congratulations, Melissa d’Arabian. You no longer have the worst show on the Food Network.

Did you watch Private Chefs of Beverly Hills? What did you think? Would you tune in again?



Other posts on Food Network Humor:

---The Private Chefs of Beverly Hills Drinking Game
---Food Network Chefs: Where Are They Now?
---FNH Review: What Would Brian Boitano Make
---South Park Versions Of Food Network Chefs
---If Rachael Ray Had Her Own Private Island…

    183 Responses

  1. Gypsy says:

    I didn’t see it, but it sounds putrid. I don’t think I could’ve gotten through the whole thing.

  2. Dave says:

    I saw it and “putrid” is a compliment! I’m in total agreement that it’s worse than Ten Dollar Dinners.

  3. Gayle King says:

    I was looking forward to this show because I am a reality TV junkie. Real Housewives to Millionaire Matchmaker, I love it all. I must say this was pretty darn bad. Maybe the real lives of the chefs are boring, but then so were the scripted story lines the writers came up with. This was better than the sneak peek episode Food Network aired last month, but not by much. I would not tune in again.

  4. Neo says:

    I hated that little punk Jesse on Work Out and I hate him here too. That is all.

  5. You Know WhoIam says:

    Hot or not, anyone who lists Sandra Lee or Rachael Ray as a major culinary influence should never be trusted.

    • froglegs says:

      Yep. Those 2 are perfect examples of having been at the right place, at the right time!! I should be so lucky! LOL!

  6. Judith says:

    Jillian, just lie down, stick a straw in a bottle of your favorite adult beverage, insert in your mouth and drink while lying down down in a dark room. After a few hours you will begin to recover your sanity. Thank you for putting your sanity on the line for the rest of us.

  7. Like the show or not, let me clarify a couple of things about the Glamping segment…our group is an actual meetup group that meets monthly to help one another with our professional challenges. We were simply asked to do our next meetup on the show. We met, and quite frankly, had the best meetup to date. We talked business, life and learned much about each other. Ya, I helped them start the fire as I’m good with such things, but why not? It was cold and windy and the production team and chefs had their hands full, so I helped them out. I’d like to thank the Food Network, the chefs and the production team for this opportunity. Our meetup group has strengthened its bond and we are in the process of scheduling our next meetup in a similar fashion, sans cameras.

    • oh_come_on says:

      And you may ask yourself “What is that beautiful house?”
      And you may ask yourself “Where does that highway go?”
      And you may ask yourself “Am I right?…Am I wrong?”
      And you may tell yourself “MY GOD!…WHAT HAVE I DONE?”

      Really Eric, not sure FN HUMOR really cares if your group is real or not. Why no women in your meetup, helping with your ‘professional challenges’? Regardless, the show was LAME!

    • BOO says:

      Oooooooh, is somebody squealin’ like a pig?

    • Lana says:

      Wow. I need a meetup group like that too. On second thought, I already have a meetup group like that! We go soaking at the local hot springs. S’pose FN wants to cater us too? Suits optional! Think of the ratings we’d get!
      *guffaws*

    • Chris says:

      Meetup Group? Is that slang for a bunch of guys on the downlow?

    • Karen says:

      I notice in this comment that you did not give the name of this meetup group – “the superfriends” is how you describe the meetup over on your blog. I think the children are right to laugh at you, Ralph.

    • Veganista says:

      Well, thanks for the positive spin on your “glamping” trip. The situation, however, deserves our mocking and derision. In addition, apparently you don’t believe in female executives. So don’t tell us this was a “meetup”. In the corporate world they’re called retreats. So let’s call it what is really is, shall we?

    • Who cares? They called you. You didn’t call them. They solicited you. You never would have hired caterers for a GLAMPING trip, so as far as I’m concerned, it’s all bullshit.

    • KristenS says:

      Don’t care about your incredibly non-masculine “meetup” group. You may have had fun, but it made for terribly uninteresting TV.

    • Teague says:

      Do you guys also do each others make up and hair well. Perhaps you all sing along to Justin Bieber songs in front of the mirror. Or do you just gossip about boys?

  8. One of the “chefs” was also on the bravo workout show.

  9. Beans says:

    I swear to god I saw a show just like this!

    To the Googles!

    *a few minutes later*

    Wait…it’s the same show? http://tv.gawker.com/5437076/private-chefs-of-beverly-hills-serves-up-bitchy-clients-catty-chefs

    I saw this episode last year and if the show that just aired is the premiere show… I am so confused.

  10. jamie.thomas says:

    I was unfortunate enough to see it.

    Still recovering.

    Christ what a trainwreck.

  11. pita says:

    Did anyone else notice all the Tupperware in the brooke and stuart parts? I’m not sure of what all stuart has done to be called a chef, but he is one of the 2 chefs Tupperware has in the flyers and catalogs.

  12. zyncooktop says:

    I had it on for background noise while I showered, dried hair, put on makeup. All I remember was some whiny ick saying, “I’m cold I’m hungry .” Go home baby! And then the chef says something like, once I get the fire going your food will be ready in 15 minutes. Huh? Real life doesn’t work this way!

  13. Rebecca says:

    You have no idea what you’re talking about. The chefs aren’t actors but yes, when choosing people to be on any TV show you “cast” people that look good and can work on camera. Not an easy task. Uh guess what? This is TV, it’s entertainment. People don’t tune in to learn how to do brain surgery, it’s supposed to be fun.
    JIllian Madison (if that’s your real name) you’re an idiot.
    Why are you taking tiny little facts of truth and twisting them into lies? It’s writers like you that give real journalism a bad name.
    If you don’t like the show don’t watch it.

    • Scruffy says:

      “it’s supposed to be fun”

      Jillian very plainly stated fun was nowhere to be found in a show that should’ve been aborted upon conception. A show presented as real that is very obviously contrived and insults the intelligence of the viewers it is attempting to gain.

      Better grab your asbestos apron, Rebecca, you’re about to get flamed.

      • Lollipop says:

        Scruffy, you are hysterical.

        Rebecca, can you please just leave & not come back – no one wants you here.

    • BOO says:

      Rebecunt, if you don’t like reading what Ms Madison writes, go the fuck away!

    • Karen says:

      “This is TV, it’s entertainment.”

      And yet, the show was in no way entertaining. So it’s still a fail.

    • MoeBiscuits says:

      Hey Rebecca,

      People tune in to sitcoms and crime dramas for entertainment. Food Network is (or at least used to be) educational. Some of us expect a little more than trash TV, especially when we’re paying upwards of $40 a month for it.

      “JIllian Madison (if that’s your real name) you’re an idiot.” Really? Name calling? What grade are you in? And the “if that’s your real name” comment. For fuck’s sake, do you really think my driver’s license reads “Moe Biscuits?”

      “Tiny little facts?” I’d say Jillian covered the whole gamut of the show, not just “tiny little facts.”

      It’s called Food Network HUMOR, not the Associated F’ing Press. Where exactly did you get the idea that this website was supposed to be “Real Journalism?”

      “If you don’t like the show don’t watch it.” Umm…if you don’t like the website, don’t take the time to register, create a profile, log in, read the latest article, then post negative comments.

      Look, I wouldn’t tell you to leave just because I don’t like what you have to say – that would be downright hypocritical of me. After all, I do waste hours watching shows I don’t like, only to piss & moan about ‘em later on FNH. Feel free to post here as much as you like. Just be ready for a lot of disagreements…some respectful, some not so much.

      Cheers.

    • katherine says:

      Couldnt have said it better rebecca

    • zyncooktop says:

      Go home and don’t come back!

    • Betty Crocker says:

      “Tiny little facts of truth.” That just made me spew! Ha! What exactly does that mean? They’re tiny, but they’re still facts? Facts of TRUTH even! I’m laughing so hard I’m crying.

      • MoeBiscuits says:

        Oh geez! I totally missed that. And I get accused of being the “grammar police.” I am ashamed.

      • Betty Crocker says:

        No, no, Moe! I was referring to this sentence from Rebecca’s post above: “Why are you taking tiny little facts of truth and twisting them into lies?”

        Not you! You were the first one to call her on that little gem, in fact. :)

      • ladycrim says:

        Sounds right up there with Stephen Colbert’s “truthiness”.

    • Emily says:

      Rebecca and Katherine: Please go away. You are what we affectionately (well, there really is no affection, but anyway) call “Oxygen Thieves.” You steal perfectly good oxygen from the rest of us. This results in you having moments where you think that you have something interesting and original to say. Please leave the originality and interesting tidbits to those of us who have both intelligence and fully functioning brain. And Katherine: please learn to use proper punctuation. It isn’t hard. No, really, it isn’t hard. That little Down Syndrome Corky kid in “Life Goes On” was able to use proper punctuation.

  14. Scruffy says:

    How dare you besmirch the good name of Jim Walsh! All he wants is to play basketball with Brandon, eat a good meal, and show a little chest hair, dammit!

  15. Mystie says:

    If the reality TV lovers think it’s bad, then you KNOW it’s bad! *shudder*

  16. Mary G says:

    I guess I am in the minority here, but I liked the show. Thought it was funny. Why you guys so angry?

    • Rebecca says:

      I know…why is everyone so angry? I guess if you agree that the show sucked these people like you but if you have any other opinion they hate you.
      Hey everyone it’s a TV show…go get a life!

      • BOO says:

        Rebecunt, as Moe stated, we have fun here. Yes, Jillian Madison provides that. You cannot come in here and call her an idiot!

      • Alex says:

        I don’t see any angry people here, just people that might expect some quality programming out of the Food Network and enjoy making fun of the trash they actually do air. The channel has devolved into a train wreck of Guy Ferry shows, Rachel Ray’s nonsense, the insufferable Challenge shows, and Bobby Flay’s ego boost of the month. Also, telling people to get a life when you are on an internet message board defending a crap reality show is a bit ridiculous.

      • Mary G says:

        “Boo”, changing Rebecca’s name to what you guys have really gives the site some validity and class. Nice job.

        People sure do love to hate.

        And your point regarding this site being for humor would be so much better supported if the site was funny like it used to be. Now it’s just mean, which is really too bad.

      • MoeBiscuits says:

        Mary, Rebecca…sweethearts, no one here is angry. At least, not in the sense that you imply. We’re all just kinda “venting,” if you will. From where I stand, it looks like FN has gone the way of MTV, going from content-related programming to trashy reality shows for the sake of ratings from the masses of asses. Who knows, maybe we might eventually accomplish something here and FN will start FN2, with shows about…FOOD!

      • MoeBiscuits says:

        Yeaaaaah…uhh, sorry Boo, but I’m gonna have to side with Mary. The deliberate name change there is rather harsh.

      • Scruffy says:

        I’m kinda in that same “out of line” camp. The deliberate name change was unnecessary.

        I’ve lodged my displeasure with the “if you don’t like it leave” attitude that crops up sometimes here and I will continue to.

        I welcome a good, witty debate that stays relatively civil, intelligent, and good-natured. I’m sure I watch shows that other people consider utter crap. Even excellent shows have their detractors. I’m sure even Breaking Bad has people whining that there’s no way a real terminally ill high school chemistry teacher would become a meth cook.

        What most regulars of this site don’t like is fake. Rachel Ray is fake as fake can be. Paula has become faker than her tan, her hair, and her veneers. Guy is fake. Sandy is fake. Melissa takes the fake cake. Duff and his merry band of tools seem fake but are probably authentic burnouts. Flay is fake. Giada has a lot of fake mixed into her.

        The authentic people very rarely get criticized. Alton is held in high regard. Brian Boitano is also. Sara Moulton is respected. Anyone associated with America’s Test Kitchen is respected. Ted Allen, Tom Colichio, Rick Bayless are very rarely criticized here because they are authentic.

        Private Chefs of Beverly Hills is as fake as The Hills. It’s from the MTV school of scripted reality, and it’s not done well enough to fool anyone. And it’s being presented to a demographic smarter than people who think Heidi Montag is a decent human being.

        Some of us avoid the stinking, rotting placentas of shows that gunk up the E!s, the Bravos, the TLCs, and the MTV/VH1s of the world. But FN corporate seems to think, and I pull out my best Jon Lovitz voice here, that “that’s the ticket.”

    • Kathy says:

      Scruffy, very well put!!

  17. Andrew says:

    There’s no way Melissa d’Arabian still doesn’t have the worst show on FN.

    • katherine says:

      melissas show is the worst one on there by far, PCOBH is hilarious, fun and you get to see some really nice food !!!

      • MoeBiscuits says:

        Oh, I get it now! You’re a troll! Good times. Enjoy.

      • Scruffy says:

        katherine appears to have some sort of a vested interest in the show. While that may mean some intensive therapy is in order for her, and while I would be happy if she just learned basic typing skills, and while she apparently can’t formulate some basic points beyond rehashed propaganda, she does have a right to enjoy her poor taste.

        She must love E!

    • katherine says:

      ha ha scruffy you are hilarious! you are right I LOVE E! too !!!!!!!!! The show will be a success wait until you see, by far the most entertaining show on FN right now.

      • Scruffy says:

        Please never have children.

      • Michelle says:

        this debate is hilarious! No “reality” show is real so yes as it may not be for everyone let’s keep it real by at least acknowledging that fact. Reality shows are ridiculous because people love to see other people make an ass out of themselves that’s why it works!

        I am curious to see if it gets a season 2!

  18. MoeBiscuits says:

    I only caught a few minutes here & there of the show. Frankly, I lost all interest with the promos talking about the chefs having to cook for the “pampered dogs.”

    “Let me see if I have this right, Mr. Producer-head: You want me to spend an entire day pushing my cooking talents to the limits for an animal that eats turds out of the cat box, licks its own ass, and drinks from the toilet? Oh, and I have to listen to the owners bitch about the food I prepare for said critters? Fuckin’-A man! Where do I sign up!?!?”

    And am I the only one here who questions the validity of Eric Greenspan’s identity here?

  19. Spatuler says:

    Saw the show, and I have two words: LOVED IT! lol not really. My sis didn’t want to watch it so we didn’t. But something tells me that this review is a whole hell of a lot more entertaining than the actual show. Come to think of it, so are a lot of these comments. Hmmmm….

  20. Kenneth says:

    As Joe Biden would say, this show sucked a fat throbbing cock.

  21. Justin H says:

    I saw this show before… it was called “Two Dudes Catering” and it was a lot better than this fluff.

    • stoup says:

      I agree. That was a good show about catering, not whiny “actors” cast on a stupid show about Botox, dog massage and male bonding. Epic fail for PCOBH.

  22. Freezezzy says:

    I saw the commercials. That was enough.

    If I had tried to watch it, I would have ended up punching my TV.

    Did I mention that I hate reality TV? Especially the overtly fake ones. The ones that are just full of manufactured drama. I can’t stand that crap.

  23. alexis says:

    Rebecca, Mary, Katherine, exactly which castmembers are you?

    You thought this review was mean? Please! This review was kind, considering how bad the show was. I was expecting this site to slam it far more than it did. This recap was tame.

    At least have the balls to use your real names. I’m sorry your show sucks, but it is what it is/

  24. Frank says:

    Longtime lurker on this hilariou site. breaking my no comment rule because my wife made me watch this show and it sucked. that opinion doesnt make me angry or bitter. but if that is what you need to tell yourselves in order to sleep at night, go right ahead.

    i give it 1 season max.

  25. Jenna says:

    I can’t believe I wasted my Friday night watching this shit!

    Personally I can hardly watch Jesse for 5 minutes without wanting to puke. He annoys me. These people seem more like actors and less like believable chefs.

    Manoshka (or however you spell her name) learned how to cook from her grandmother. Ok, I learned how to play guitar from my brother. Can I go on tour with Dave Matthews now?

    • Dave says:

      How you feel about Jesse is how I feel about Brian Hill. Literally can not get to the mute button fast enough when he comes on. His overanimation is really grating on the nerves.

      Did anyone notice the look on Brian’s face when the campers gave him the fresh fish and asked hiim to cook it? He looked at the fish like it was a plate of cow shit. It’s called fresh ingredients, Brian. Figure it out.

  26. Ben says:

    I just wanted to say that I watched the show. And like so many of you I thought it reeked.

    Also, I think it is hilarious that castmembers (or family/friends of castmembers at the very least) are coming here, making up fake names, and defending this shitfest.

    Gotta love FNH! I love you Jillian, you make me laugh every day :)

  27. Oveta says:

    I love the “take your ball and go home” comments. That really worked out well, didn’t it?

    All in all, I thought the show was ridiculously contrived, but was exactly the reality crap I love to watch. It is pretty sad that FN can’t just let things happen and script everything to hell.

  28. cloverleaf says:

    I guess the fans/relatives/cast members of PCoBH failed to notice that FNH is all about the hilarious snark and that the members here are into humor. We vent here because we remember when the FN had some quality programming. Jillian and Michelle Madison provide us with silly and on-point spoofs of the FN. We love them for it. :)

  29. Beans says:

    You know…all we need now is one of those comments I see on EW.com: “Who cares! My boyfriend is 10 years older and he thinks the same as me…blahblahblah-stupiddatingwebsite.com-blahblahblah.”

  30. Motzi Greps says:

    I DVRd this show knowing it would make the front page of FNH and we’d all be here snarking away! YAY! What a shitstorm this opened up eh?!

    What this show lacked in spontaneity and reality it made up for in stupidity and insipidity. Contrived horseshit.

    That being said, I have to admit that having catered events for wealthy assholes back in my day–the depiction of THAT end of the event was pretty accurate. Demanding, annoying, intrusive, bitchy dickbags are de rigeur.

    • Lana says:

      “bitchy dickbags” Yeah! Which is what makes me wonder why on earth ANY “quality” producer (note use of annoying quotation marks) would want to make a television show out of it!

      There is one and ONLY one positive thing I could say about FN (well, two things; but the other is non sequitor) – it was one channel I could flip past and be assured of watching something relatively serene and uplifting, or at the very least unoffensive.

      Love Bravo, but just can NOT STAND the Real Housewives thingy – the bitchiness! the back stabbing! Honestly, I get enough of that elsewhere, I do NOT need to watch it on TV too.

      Chefs of Beverly Hills is just more of the same.

    • stoup says:

      “bitchy dickbags” – that’s excellent! (May I please use it in everyday conversation?)

  31. toolshed says:

    Wait – slow down!! Still trying to digest what one means by “glamping”…??

  32. Gypsy says:

    It’s official: I now have a crush on several of you regular posters who deftly and articulately defend this site!

  33. oh_come_on says:

    Think Tuschman’ll hire a ‘chef’ for a pet food spin-off show? FN posted the recipes in case PB&J Puppy Pate or a Cantaloupe Gazpacho Shooter’s in your (or your pooch’s) future.

  34. Sarah says:

    Programming weasels lead by the Tuschman guy have officially hit rock bottom.

    Just disgusting they would allow shit like this to hit the airwaves. Just one more reason to seriously get behind PBS for all our culinary show requirements.They would never insult viewers like this.

    • Mary G says:

      Sarah,
      You know so much about running cable channels. You must be a really high level executive. Oh wait. You’re not.

  35. Honestly, I’m just shocked that anyone found this review to be MEAN. I didn’t even directly insult anyone! I didn’t mock anyone’s appearance or call anyone out on making bad food. In fact, this is probably one of the tamest reviews I’ve ever written here on FNH. I simply offered an *OPINION* and questioned the honesty of some of the segments. Clearly, that hit a nerve with some people. And frankly, if the castmembers and/or producers were looking for a glowing review, sorry, there’s no way in hell they were going to find it here at a satire website.

    And “real journalism?” Please. Like other posters said, this is a satire site, not freakin’ Newsweek. I’m not a journalist and never purported to be one.

    Hardly anyone (“real” journalists or not) is even mentioning this show, and that’s the real mark of an awful program. There’s no buzz. No one cares. It’s not even worth anyone’s time to mention or critique, because in my OPINION, it’s that bad. Are the castmembers lovely people? Sure. But that’s not the point.

    FNH offered some of the only publicity on the internet for this show. As far as I’m concerned, the cast/crew should be happy about that. Any publicity is good publicity, especially when the majority of people in the world don’t even know your show exists.

    • Lana says:

      Amen Jill.

      A review is what it is – the reviewer either likes it or doesn’t; and any writer worth their salt will say what they think. You did; cast members didn’t like it.

      Too bad, so sad. Move on.

    • lidia says:

      actually there is a hell of a lot of reviews on the internet over this show, have you heard of google? you should check it out sometime.

      • Scruffy says:

        If there were a hell of alot of reviews, it would make a blip on Metacritic. Which it hasn’t. There’s not one mention of the show on Metacritic, and the whole point of the site is to aggregate reviews together.

        Some impact there.

      • Lana says:

        Umm, Google provided me with three reviews (other than this one): One on Monsters and Critics (written BEFORE the show aired), One on Eating L.A. (written by someone who was ON the show) and one on wannabetvchef.com (written by someone who WANTS to be a TV chef).

        “lidia,” provide me with links to, say, 5 or 6 of “the Hell Of A Lot Of Reviews” you mentioned, written AFTER the show aired, NOT by someone who was ON the show and by someone who does NOT have an ulterior motive towards smooching up to FoodTV.

        TYVM

    • Motzi Greps says:

      LOL! Don’t mess with FNH members. PERIOD.

    • FoodieOne says:

      As usual, Jillian, you’ve brought up the best point of the day: This site provides publicity for Food Network. A few have said it, and I’m sure there are others who *specifically* watch a program in order to be more educated when coming to this site! It certainly is more fun to read your hilarious recaps when one has actually seen the show.

      As an aside – thanks to you, I became aware of the new season of “Top Chef Masters”. I DVR’d it so that I could see it before I read your recap.

      As far as Chefs of Beverly Hills, it was a pointless piece of fluff. The next time it airs, I wouldn’t change the channel, but I certainly wouldn’t bother DVR’ing it.

    • Mike says:

      I agree with you on almost everything Jillian, except for your use of the term “real journalism”. From what I read, you have a much better command of the English language than so-called journalists. [As an aside, I think the only mistake that caught my eye is that the guy chef with Brooke is named Stuart, not Patrick. But given that he is Irish and Saint Patrick's day just passed, that mistake is understandable. :) That said, the only reason it caught my eye was because the commercial for the show plays once every 10 minutes and I see the names "Stuart", "Jesse", and "Brooke" in large font on my TV every said 10 minutes.]

      Your commentaries are smart, true, and intentionally… I want to say intentionally biased, but I think your commentary is pretty objective given what FN gives you to work with. I do not despise FN as much as you and the other commentators make themselves sound, but I must say FN is going way overboard with the “reality” TV shows as well as new cooking shows that are no different than the other cooking shows already shown.

      I do think the comments sometimes make me cringe though, but I just scroll past them for the most part anyway.

  36. Kathy says:

    There is only one redeeming quality of this show that I can see (I didn’t watch it, just read this review.)…

    More fodder for the Soup! I want to see Joel McHale skewer this one so bad!! It’s just asking for it!

    • Scruffy says:

      I think I’d rather watch I Love Toy Trains!

      • Kathy says:

        I would never watch the Private Chef’s of Beverly Hills anymore than I would willingly sit through an episode of Tool Academy or Rock of Love or Jersey Shore. I just want to see them make fun of that show.

  37. Daria says:

    I was flipping around channels on Sunday and saw part of the show. I immediately felt FN had sunken to a new low.
    It just wasn’t interesting to me and I have never felt that reality shows belonged on FN.
    At least when the new cooking channel premieres we will have some separation, and FN can die in a fire.

    • Freezezzy says:

      Remember MTV2? Their tagline when it started was “Where the music’s at.” Now look at them. Just chock full of the same reality crap as the first MTV.

      I see Food2 ending up the same way.

  38. Sandra Lee's Liver says:

    Jillian, really. This was NOT the worst show on television. It is tied with MINUTE TO WIN IT on NBC.
    C’mon!!!

  39. Chickety China, the Chinese Chicken says:

    Thank you, oh thank you, FN Humor, for sparing me having to expose my eyes to this big hot mess.

  40. Boston_Dan says:

    I did not see the show, purposely. I knew just from the commercials for it, that I would only wind up blasting my TV with a shotgun. C’mon, really? Chefs cooking for dogs? In Bev Hills? How low can this celebrity obsessed culture of ours go? I can’t believe how many of these stupid, vapid, so-called reality shows there are on TV. It’s truly frightening, because obviously a good number of people are watching them. It’s one of the signs of the apocalypse.

  41. Boston_Dan says:

    In reference to another post, I STRONGLY prefer to watch the PBS cooking shows over FN. Even the 40 year old Julia Child repeats. (They are as much a hoot as they are educational.) There are now very few FN shows that I actually watch. I can’t stand Paula Deen, the Neely’s, Rachel, Sandra, Alex Guarnabitchy, Melissa D’Akeepinmybaconindafreezuh, the endless cake shows or any of the stupid cooking competitions, esp Chopped. Give me Lidia, Jacques, Daisy and America’s Test Kitchen any ole day.

    • lostinplace says:

      here here, Dan! and throw in Sara Moulton, if her shows are still on or in syndication!!!!!

    • Meg says:

      I love to watch these oldies. Throw in a little Justin Wilson, the coon-ass cook. Just get rid of this “private chefs” BS. It was worse than almost any of the shows on FN. They just keep getting worse and worse.

  42. Boston_Dan says:

    And speaking of lame, did anyone see this weekend’s episode of Brian Boitano’s show? Horrid!!!!!

    • Meg says:

      Doesn’t make much difference which week’s show it is. They’re all like that! somebody give him a job so he will get off FN.

  43. Jonathan Doan says:

    Glamping? GLAMPING?? ARE??? YOU?????? SERIOUS??????????

    I know this show is centered around Beverly Hills clientele, but how diluted are these people in thinking they are actually CAMPING?? Ugh.

    At least when the zombie holocaust happens, these fruitcakes will be the first to go. Me, I got my shotgun loaded and a whole lotta double-tappin’ waiting!!

  44. I’ve done a good deal of catering in my career as a chef and just about every time you do an on site event, someone has come up with some idea since the menu was finalized. The difference is with normal people you tell them, “No problem; here’s how much extra that will cost you.” 99% of the time they say, “Nevermind.” For the Beverly Hills crowd money is no object. And of course the staff is attractive, Big City Chefs works with dozens of chefs, do you really think that their going to send out the ones that look like me? It’s LA everyone in that city is “also an actor.”

    This is far from the worst show on Food Network, nor is $10 Dinners. That award is between Big Daddy’s House (Aaron, you are mumbling to the wall again – face the camera and enunciate), The Barefoot Contessa (Ina = Ben Stein on estrogen) and What Would Brian Boytano Make?

    Who am I kidding? There has never, in the history of television been a show as bad as What Would Brian Boytano Make?

  45. cloverleaf says:

    There is actually a review (more like an episode re-cap) on CNN.com’s The Marquee Page:

    http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/10/tv-recap-food-networks-private-chefs-of-beverly-hills/

    Our pal from up-thread, Eric Greenspan, posted in the comments section:

    ‘Eric Greenspan April 10th, 2010 10:28 pm ET

    I was on the Glamping episode and let me just tell you this…these folks can cook! We had a blast. The crew rocked, the chefs rocked, the whole damn thing was fantastic.

    P.S. I started the fire. (off camera)’

  46. Jennifer says:

    I actually liked it. I was fully expecting to hate it but the trashy sucked me in. And I’ll end my comments about the show there.

    I seriously hate the commercial for it, though. It really gets on my nerves when the one blonde chef, I think her name is Brooke, is saying “They know what they want and if they don’t get it they will fuhreek ouuutttt.” It’s just an assault on my ears, the way she says it.

    I’m really disappointed to find out they aren’t actually chefs. Was it so hard to find real chefs who would want a show? I could understand why people who hire private chefs wouldn’t want cameras parading around in their houses and during their parties, but surely it can’t be that difficult to find a single catering company with honest to god chefs catering actual parties?

  47. Judith says:

    Glamping:Found in The Rachael Ray Dictionary under-Dumb.

  48. Lizzie says:

    I watched a few minutes and had to turn it off. A show about botox parties and cooking for dogs, ugh!

  49. Chris says:

    I took one for the team when I watched this crapfest. It was like watching a train wreck… so horrible a visage I couldn’t turn away. I was secretly hoping during the dog segment they would give the dogs’ entrees to the humans. I knew I had seen that Jesse dude somewhere, but I couldn’t place him. He’s such a waste of space. The review was accurate, but it doesn’t really convey the agony this show caused. It’s not her fault- it’s the difference between reading about food poisoning and actually experiencing it. And that’s what the show was- mental poison.

    Alton Brown has the only really good show on FN. I’d watch Nigella, but I’m not willing to get up before 7 on a Saturday just for that. Throwdown is OK, but only if I mute Flay and leave after the guy who has perfected his recipe has had his 5-10 minutes of air time showing his technique.

    So many FN shows just flat out suck. Anthony Bourdain was right when he compared Guy Fieri to Poochie, the cartoon character added to Itchy and Scratchy to make the show more “hip.” With any luck, FN’s execs will have a response similar to I&S’s by interrupting his show with a handwritten sign that reads, “Guy died on his way back to his home planet” followed by 25 minutes of dead air time.

    Some of the PBS shows are much better. Lidia, Julia & Jacques, Sara Moulton, Ming, and ATK are all great. Rick Bayless is awesome- he’s the Bob Ross of Mexican food. John Folse is pretty good if you can get past his good ole boy mannerisms.

    But PBS does have some really bad shows too. Daisy can’t cook. Neither can Christina. I have no idea how Ciao Italia has been on so long. Ruth Reichl annoys me to no end. Nick Stellino has the charisma of a syphilitic goat. And I’m not sure what they were thinking when they funded New Scandinavian Cooking.

    PBS is good, but it’s not a panacea for the various FN brain poisons.

    • Kathy says:

      My husband thinks Christina can’t cook, either. He has issues with her ever since she suggested on one episodes that it was okay to trick your carnivorous friends into eating vegan food by not telling them it was vegan food.

  50. Chickety China, the Chinese Chicken says:

    thanks to DVR, I can record Alton when he’s on, and catch the occasional Iron Chef, if its anyone other than Bobby Flay, and bypass the whole seething gooey seventh ring of hell that the Food Network has become.

  51. Mary G says:

    Have you guys ever thought that the Food Network has had to try new things to compete in this marketplace? That they have to try new types of shows to bring new viewers to the channel so they dont go under? That not all of their shows can cater to food snobs? It seems from these comments that most of you dont leave the house very often, but it’s a rough econoomical world out there.

    • Lana says:

      Yes Mary, I have thought of that. I’ve always wondered why FN hasn’t tried something new to compete in the marketplace. But instead, (at least in the case of this program under discussion) they’ve masticated and regurgitated the same-old-same-old-shoulda-been-on-Bravo.

      Am waiting for the spin off show hosted by Guy Fieri, “The Real Housewives of Private Chefs of Flavortown”

  52. Mary G says:

    Now that’s a show I would watch, Lana! ;)

  53. StephMook says:

    it was garbage

  54. Keith Lee says:

    I must check into a mental institution ASAP because I actually enjoyed the ridiculous situations of this show and it just proved that Apocalypse is near; c’mon: dog spas, botox parties and “glamping”! Plus a chef from a Bravo show!

  55. Brooke says:

    I also listed Thomas Keller and Anthony Bourdain as some of my favorite influences. Real people actually have to make food for their families which is why I listed Sandra Lee and Rachael Ray. Tough crowd!

    • You Know WhoIam says:

      Tough crowd? You were the only person the author of the original post complimented. Way to focus on the negative, Brooke.

    • Dave says:

      Real people have to make food for their families, obviously. But you should not have to take unhealthy shortcuts like Sandra Lee. As a CHEF, you should know that, and probably be embarrassed to share a profession with her. Not list her as a great culinary influence.

    • Mary G says:

      I thought you were great, Brooke. You were my favorite chef on the show! Way to stick up for yourself.

    • Mike says:

      Meh. The cast members were fine. They served their roles as chefs, and from Eric’s post the food was good. I doubt they would go as far as to have good looking chefs put on-screen and another group of the real but less pretty chefs cooking the actual food. Just let them have a little fun and exposure, and let us mock how staged everything seems in good jest. Because of the show, I doubt any of the chefs can continue to be private chefs though, at least not for rich people who do not want to be on TV. Might as well have fun filming it and watching it and whatnot.

      As for Sandra Lee, it pains me to say this, but… Even if most of her recipes require a lot of tweaking to be healthy and/or appetizing (very difficult to achieve both given her base recipe), at least she gets a few people who have no idea how to cook to actually begin the process of learning how to cook. Even if it just means demonstrating on the show how to follow instructions on the baking mix and perhaps adding milk to it (i.e. the semi-homemade part)… Everyone starts somewhere. I would consider that inspiration in a way.

      And for the record, the terms “tablescape” and “glamping” deserve ridicule. Period.

    • Mike says:

      It seems like the show’s chefs are getting a bit offended by this forum and reacting on Twitter using thinly veiled sarcasm. They seem like nice, unassuming people, so I just ask that they either grow thicker skin or not visit this site. I would prefer not to see them get burnt too badly. That said, being on TV has consequences.

    • Teague says:

      You brought it on yourself. Sandra-Lee really? If anything you got off easy. Keller and Bourdain? Someone is clearly giving you a list to recite from.

  56. trentsketch says:

    Jesse wasn’t exactly a personal trainer on Work Out, either. It was like playing “one of these things is not like the other?”–ripped, ripped, ripped, flaming chubby guy causing drama, ripped, ripped. So, actors, the whole lot of them.

    And I still liked the show because I have a problem. I’m addicted to reality TV. It has to be CW hour length or better in quality, so Private Chefs…barely scrapes by while Fly Girls or Diners, Drive Ins, and Dives go on the no-watch list.

    • Michelle says:

      Jesse actually IS a trainer and was one on work out. The fact that he is a chef and loves food attributed to the storyline of the show. He became a trainer to try and keep the weight gain in control. At least get the facts straight if you’re going to comment. I am not a huge reality show fan but before I make comments I like to do my homework.

  57. ChefJon1039 says:

    As someone who makes his living as a private caterer to some pretty wealthy and eccentric folks, I guess I am somewhat torn about this show.
    There have been many occasions with my job, including a dog’s birthday party, when I have shaken my head and said to myself “man, someone should film this s**t.” But, most of the time, to someone watching, it’s pretty boring. Yes, it’s exciting for me and my assistants, but as TV fodder, it misses the mark.
    What really drives me crazy is the infantile way these scenarios are manipulated by producers so that the “chefs” are relegated to running around like rats in a maze rather than being able to do their jobs. To add insult to injury is that real chefs aren’t even used. It debases my profession and mocks the years of work I have put in a similar operation. Come to think of it, I’m actually glad that none of these guys are real chefs. If these were real chefs it would be a greater embarrassment to the profession.

    I really wish that some of these shows would turn the tables every once in a while and concentrate on what vain selfish alien creatures these “glampers” and “botox partiers” really are.

    • Clay says:

      Don’t know about others, but Stuart is a chef and has a catering business in LA. I think everyone on here should go to the show’s site and read the cast bios before making blanket statements. And at the end of the day guys, FN is calling this a ‘docu-soap,’ so the situations/storylines are planned out, just like any other ‘reality’ show. And it actually did well in the ratings so don’t watch this one if you don’t like it because half a million people seem to be watching. If you want to watch a straight up cooking demonstration show, then go to the Cooking Channel (formerly known as Fine Living Channel) where FN is putting all of those type shows and making FN more entertainment based shows that have a food component.

      • Mike says:

        It is not so much we doubt these chefs had businesses as private chefs in the past, just that I am not sure this kind of exposure (i.e. the confessionals and body language on camera) will allow them to continue on as normal (no camera) private chefs in the future. Building new bridges no doubt, but also burning down their original, more straightforward and probably more predictable bridge of being a chef for hire.

        Considering that people making a mockery of the show are actually watching it–I am just here to throw out my two cents at the show’s concept–and part of the half million people you speak of, I doubt these chefs and everyone involved with the show really want them to “don’t watch if you don’t like.”

  58. MJ says:

    Um…..wow. I can’t believe this many people are THIS serious about reality TV. “OMG, everything is scripted, planned, etc. etc.!” Really? No way. That’s news to me. HELLO! This is SUPPOSED to be fun and silly with planned scenarios! ALL reality TV is! Get a grip, folks. And so what what if a bunch of dudes want to get together for a meet-up? Aren’t we ladies always giving guys crap for not communicating enough? Don’t we WANT to have better men in our society? Will, hell, let ‘em have their time to talk and bond. Fill in those chips on your shoulders and grow a pair:-).

  59. Diane says:

    UGH! I’m glad to read your review on this show. I won’t bother with it.
    It sounds to me like that ‘staging’ show on HGTV, which sounded interesting in theory, but turned out to be about a bunch of drama queens flailing around and shouting. Ridiculous.

  60. Teague says:

    Could it be worse than The Naughty Kitchen with that big fat obnoxious (possibly fake) chef?

  61. Lindsey R. says:

    I saw it, and I too couldn’t believe that if it were real, these chefs would shit talk their clients to the cameras behind their backs.

  62. Babylonia says:

    when they start out cooking for pampered dogs, it’s all over.

    throw in the words “glamping” and “botox” and it’s more than over.

    • Lizzie says:

      I have NEVER understood people’s obsession with the rich and famous! What is enjoyable in watching a bunch of people who have more money than good sense prancing around throwing birthday parties for their dogs and shoving toxins in their faces? Please don’t even get me started about “glamping,” ewww.

  63. Katie says:

    OK ,so at first I was excited about this show UNTIL the most current of shows. When this tool of a chef was “TRYING” to cook Kosher. OK HES BLACK should that be an excuse? And accidentally he dropped the meat on the ground in front of the ( sorry I’m catholic and I am not sure of the correct name ) Rabbi (sp???) Could that be more contrived???? And last week with that insane CAKE for the wedding planner. Come on do they really think we are that naive?? I gave it a chance as I LOVE JESSE. I think he rocks. But his air quotes MUST GO. So whoever cooks this food they do a decent job. It looks lovely. But this show is as transparent as a single layer of filo dough. OH YES.. What about that lame band from the week of April 23rd. And that Dbag manager? OK can it be more lame?? Going out a lot earlier now on Fri nights.

  64. allan says:

    I have been in the catering business for the last 40 years.

    It was such a stupid concept that I had to laugh.

    What angered me was the idea that chefs in general are stupid, don’t know how to plan, don’t know how to write a contract, or do all the preparatory investigation of the site before hand.

    No one goes in to a situation like this, and comes out ok!

    I watched the todays show. The clients were so irritating, and especially that deceitful husband that insisted on lying to his wife about who made dinner.

    I have never been asked by a wealthy family if they could come in the kitchen and WATCH!!!

    Man, all I can say is Julia Child is turning around in her grave.

  65. June Pagan says:

    Watching the show is painful for an accomplished private chef to watch. Are any of the chefs on the show serious about their future in the field or are they just trying to cash in on whatever talent they can sell for their 15 minutes of fame?
    AS a real private chef of Beverly Hills, it saddens me to think that the public is watching this show and thinking that these actors are real private chefs. One thing is that they seem to have the ego for it but they need to keep the ego outside the kitchen door!
    I was hoping that the show would be entertaining instead it is annoying. Sorry.

  66. Jenny Lane says:

    I use to work for one of the PCOBH, they are real chiefs.

  67. Catrina says:

    I enjoyed the PCBH immensely! It was a GREAT way to escape into the glamorous world of being a chef for an hour.
    Maybe another season would bring all the haters on board!

  68. HN says:

    I just wanted to say that these people cook for the most SPOILED ROTTEN people I have ever seen. There are people in the united states that are being thrown out of their homes and kids who are starving and homeless!!! These rich snobs make me want to vomit!!!! Stop stuffing your faces and get off your asses and help people who really need it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  69. Tim says:

    Horrible show. Ridiculous concept and ridiculous situations. What other people have pointed out, and what I realized early on, was that this has to be completely fake, or these “caterers” wouldn’t be left with any clients at the end of the first season. I think FN really went the wrong way here. They need to stick with the marginally acceptable reality shows they currently have and leave the setup/scripted shows to the trash TV channels where they belong.

Post your comments


LEGAL DISCLAIMER / DISCLOSURE/PRIVACY POLICY / Terms of Service
We are not affiliated with the Food Network, or any of their hosts, in any way. This is a satire, humor, and parody website.
(c) 2012 Food Network Humor - All Rights Reserved